Madras High Court Upholds Right to Peaceful Protest as Fundamental in Democracy

Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!

The Madras High Court, in a significant ruling, has reaffirmed the fundamental right to peaceful protest as an essential element of democracy, emphasizing its protection under the Indian Constitution. This decision came in response to a series of petitions filed by secondary grade teachers challenging charge memos issued by the District Educational Officer.

Also read- Gujarat High Court Dismisses PIL Against Azaan Loudspeakers, Cites Lack Of Noise Pollution Evidence (lawchakra.in)

Justice L. Victoria Gowri, presiding over the case, highlighted the constitutional guarantee of the right to peaceful protest without arms under Article 19(1)(b). She stressed that this right is a significant feature of a democratic country like India. Further, the court underscored that the right to protest is inherently linked to free speech and is an intrinsic part of the right to life as guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, members of the Tamil Nadu Primary School Teachers Federation, had protested against alleged irregularities in finalizing a seniority list of Secondary Grade Teachers. The court noted that the authorities claimed the protest caused a law-and-order problem but failed to provide evidence of police intervention or criminal complaints against the petitioners.

In her ruling, Justice Gowri stated,

“Constraining the space for legitimate dissent arbitrarily by suspending the petitioners and issuing them with charge memos under Rule 17(b) of Tamil Nadu Civil Service (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, scuttling down the democratic value system guaranteed by our Constitution had to be undermined with iron hands.”

Also read-Karnataka High Court Upholds Case Against Caste-Based Discrimination In Temple Entry Incident (lawchakra.in)

The court observed that the charge memos were issued without proper consideration and adherence to guidelines. Emphasizing the importance of dialogue, dissent, and deliberation in a democracy, the court recognized the teachers’ right to demonstrate against the department’s misuse of power as protected under Articles 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(b) of the Constitution.

The court ultimately quashed the proceedings against the teachers, stating that the allegations lacked proper scrutiny and deviated from state government guidelines. This ruling not only vindicated the teachers involved but also served as a reaffirmation of the constitutional right to peaceful protest, a cornerstone of democratic values in India.

Also read-Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Based On Social Media Data (lawchakra.in)