Madras High Court Directs State to Prevent Misuse of Official Symbols on Private Vehicles
The Madras High Court has issued a directive to state authorities, emphasizing the importance of preventing the unauthorized use of stickers and artifacts bearing official symbols such as “Govt of India,” “High Court,” “Government of Tamil Nadu,” and “Police” on private vehicles.
The bench, comprising Chief Justice SV Gangapurwala and Justice PD Audikeshavalu, remarked,
“Monitoring and survey of such vehicles is a continuous process. The respondent authorities are bound to ensure that the stickers and artifacts containing “Emblem”, “G”, “Govt of India”, “Government of Tamil Nadu”, “High Court” and “Police” and such other institutions, are not being misused and upon detection of the same, action is required to be taken by the authorities.”
This observation was made in response to a plea urging the removal of unauthorized stickers from private vehicles and calling for appropriate actions against violations. The court highlighted that a prior order in 2022 had already mandated authorities to circulate directives aimed at eliminating the unauthorized use of flags, emblems, names, and symbols. Following this order, a circular memorandum was released, leading to actions against violators. The court was informed that, to date, 104,017 private vehicles were identified in violation, resulting in fines totaling Rs. 16,56,000.
The court underscored the state’s duty to ensure that number plates on private vehicles comply with existing rules, regulations, and executive directives. With these considerations, the plea was concluded.
This ruling by the Madras High Court underscores the significance of preserving the sanctity of government symbols and institutions. By curbing unauthorized use on private vehicles, the court seeks to protect the esteem and authority of these entities, emphasizing the public’s responsibility to respect and adhere to legal regulations surrounding official emblems and titles.
Representing the petitioner was Mr. Ajay Francis Inigo Loyola, while the respondents were represented by Mr. K.M.D. Muhilan, Additional Government Pleader, and Mr. R. Muniapparaj, Additional Public Prosecutor, assisted by Mr. C.E. Pratap, Government Advocate.