Lenskart told Delhi High Court it wrongly used Titan’s trademarks like “Titan” and “Fastrack” by mistake. The Court closed the case after Lenskart agreed and removed the marks.
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!
NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court has given its decision in a trademark infringement case between Titan Company Limited and Lenskart Solutions Private Limited. Titan had accused Lenskart of misusing its popular and registered trademarks “TITAN” and “FASTRACK” both on Lenskart’s website and in the hidden parts of the site code (called metatags).
Titan, represented by Advocates Pravin Anand, Achuthan Sreekumar, Rohil Bansal, and Swastik Bisarya, filed the case asking the court to stop Lenskart permanently from using their brand names. They said it could confuse customers and make people think both companies are connected, which is not true.
Before filing the suit, Titan had even sent a legal notice on 13th February 2025 to Lenskart, pointing out the misuse.
The case was heard on 30th May 2025, where Lenskart’s legal team, including Advocates Nishchal Anand, Tanvi Jain, Vaibhav, and authorized representative Mrinal Srivastava, gave their reply.
Lenskart admitted that the use of Titan’s brand names was “on account of an inadvertent mistake”.
They also told the court that they had already removed all such names from their website.
Lenskart assured the Court:
“If the plaintiff were to inform the defendants of any such references/ listings in the future, the defendants shall ensure that the same are taken down.”
They further clarified that they never meant to harm Titan’s brand or break any trademark law:
“The defendants do not have the intention to infringe the plaintiff’s trade marks which are the subject matter of the present suit.”
Since Lenskart accepted the mistake and didn’t want to fight the case, the matter was resolved without any trial.
Justice Amit Bansal noted:
“The defendants do not wish to contest the present suit.”
The Court passed a consent decree, meaning it accepted the solution agreed by both sides, and legally bound Lenskart to follow its own statement.
The Court ordered:
“In view of the aforesaid statement, the defendants do not wish to contest the present suit. Binding the defendants to the aforesaid statement, the suit is decreed.”
The judge also noted that the matter ended very early—on the first day of hearing itself—and even before formal summons were issued. Because of this, Titan was not required to pay any court fees.
In the end, the Court said:
“All pending applications stands disposed of.”
CASE TITLE:
Titan Company Limited vs Lenskart Solutions Private Limited & Anr
Would You Like Assistance In Drafting A Legal Notice Or Complaint?
CLICK HERE
Click Here to Read Our Reports on CJI BR Gavai
Click Here to Read Our Reports on Trademark Infringement Cases
FOLLOW US ON YOUTUBE FOR MORE LEGAL UPDATES
