[BREAKING] “Conspiracy Against Prime Minister is Treason”: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court made an oral remark Today (April 24th), stating that plotting against the Prime Minister constitutes treason and is considered a grave offense.

Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!

NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court, presided over by Justice Jasmeet Singh, today expressed serious concerns regarding accusations of conspiracy against the Prime Minister, classifying such actions as potential treason. During a session held on Wednesday, the court deliberated on a defamation lawsuit initiated by Biju Janata Dal Member of Parliament and Senior Advocate, Pinaki Misra, against lawyer Jai Anant Dehadrai.

Justice Singh emphasized the gravity of making allegations against the Prime Minister, noting that such claims must be founded on solid and convincing evidence. He remarked,

“Conspiracy to target the PM is an offence under IPC. It is treason.”

Dehadrai has repeatedly accused Misra of engaging in a conspiracy aimed at Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The court highlighted the significance of these allegations, stating they carry serious implications since they involve the highest office in the country. The judge questioned Dehadrai’s basis for such accusations and cautioned about the severe ramifications of making unfounded claims.

During the hearing, the court made it clear that while it respects the freedom of expression, it cannot overlook the serious nature of Dehadrai’s allegations. The court warned,

“These are very serious allegations against the PM. You can’t be trigger happy. I have a problem here. You are alleging serious allegations of conspiracy against the PM by a sitting MP. You explain it or I will injunct you.”

The judge stressed that without substantial proof from Dehadrai, an injunction might be issued against him.

Justice Singh also addressed the broader context of the situation, acknowledging the political standing of both parties involved but maintaining the critical nature of the claims,

“It is a very limited issue which is bothering me. When you say conspiracy against the PM, it is a very serious issue. You can’t be trigger happy. You may say plaintiff is a politician and he can’t be thin skinned, I agree with that. But what you are alleging is very serious.”

The court also recognized Misra’s stature within the legal community, underscoring the respect he commands as a member of the bar, and advised Dehadrai to exercise caution in his assertions.

The defamation case at the Delhi High Court, presided over by Justice Jasmeet Singh, has taken a complex turn with multiple allegations and counterclaims involving Biju Janata Dal Member of Parliament and Senior Advocate, Pinaki Misra, and lawyer Jai Anant Dehadrai.

Misra’s lawsuit against Dehadrai involves serious accusations including derogatory nicknames such as “Canning Lane,” “Odia Babu,” and “Dalal of Puri,” pointing to an intense legal battle over alleged defamation.

PREVIOUS REPORT: “Odia Babu”, “Dalal of Puri” Remarks By Advocate Jai Anant Dehadrai, BJD MP Pinaki Misra Files Defamation Suit

The conflict traces back to Misra’s associations with Trinamool Congress leader Mahua Moitra, who previously had a relationship with Dehadrai. Misra’s legal team is pushing for an apology from Dehadrai, alongside a cessation of defamatory allegations and the removal of such content from social media platforms like X (formerly Twitter) and from news outlets.

Advocate Samudra Sarangi, representing Misra, argued that there are no references linking Misra to any corrupt activities in the Lokpal order against Moitra concerning a cash-for-query case. Sarangi clarified that Misra did not engage in any actions against Prime Minister Narendra Modi, contrary to what Dehadrai suggested. He also emphasized that Misra’s political affiliations are in line with the BJP, stating,

“My party is ideologically aligned with the BJP and the Prime Minister.”

During the court session, Dehadrai claimed direct knowledge of interactions between Misra and Moitra, alleging that Misra was involved in drafting speeches for Moitra which included specific allegations. However, Justice Singh questioned the significance of Misra’s ideological alignment with the Prime Minister in the context of these accusations, implying a potential conflict in the claims presented by Dehadrai.

In a notable development, Dehadrai’s counsel, Advocate Raghav Awasthi, announced plans to submit a CBI complaint evidencing Misra’s alleged involvement in corruption. The court swiftly scheduled a follow-up hearing to address these claims further.

Representatives for ANI, led by Advocate Siddhanth Kumar, defended their coverage, asserting that their reporting focused solely on legal proceedings and Dehadrai’s role as a complainant.

The legal proceedings reveal a tangled web of relationships and accusations, where Misra asserts that he had only limited and casual interactions with Dehadrai, primarily through common connections with Moitra. After Dehadrai and Moitra’s separation, Dehadrai began making public accusations not just against Moitra but also against Misra, suggesting a broader conspiracy involving bribery and corruption.

The case continues to evolve, with both parties entrenched in their positions and the court meticulously navigating the serious allegations and implications for all involved.

Click Here to Read Previous Reports on Prime Minister

FOLLOW US ON YOUTUBE FOR MORE LEGAL UPDATES