The Court recognized the emotions surrounding the Pran Pratishtha Mahotsav but voiced concerns that obstructing access to the High Court disrupts the administration of justice. This incident resonates with both historical reverence and contemporary civic concerns.
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!
The Rajasthan High Court highlighted an ironic situation amidst the nationwide celebrations of the “Pran Pratishtha Mahotsava” of the Ram Temple in Ayodhya. The court poignantly noted,
“The entire Country is celebrating ‘Pran Pratishtha Mahotsava’ of Ram Temple situated in Ayodhya. The real celebration would be if the society respects and follows the ideal and virtues which Lord ‘Ram’ embodied and is worshiped as an ideal person – Maryada Puroshottam Ram.”
The Pran Pratishtha Mahotsav, a significant event marking the consecration of the Ram Temple, has been a focal point of national attention. However, the Rajasthan High Court raised concerns over the impact of these celebrations on public order, particularly regarding the obstruction of roads leading to crucial public institutions. The court sought responses from the Commissioner of Police and the District Collector, questioning whether the administration had installed these barriers and if any permission had been granted for such actions.
ALSO READ: Supreme Court Questions Delay in Listing Adani Power Case: Seeking Accountability
In a directive aimed at preserving the sanctity of law and order, the Court stated,
“District Collector and Commissioner of Police are directed to ensure that in future the roads, particularly the road leading towards the High Court, is not blocked in the name of any ‘julus’, ‘dharna’ and religious celebrations.”
This statement underscores the court’s commitment to ensuring that public celebrations do not impede the administration of justice or disrupt the daily functioning of essential services.
The authorities informed the Court that the blockages had been removed, leading to the restoration of the free flow of traffic. In response to these developments, the matter was directed to be registered as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) and placed before the Chief Justice.
ALSO READ: Calcutta High Court Upholds Press Freedom | Grants Anticipatory Bail to Journalist
This incident, set against the backdrop of the Pran Pratishtha Mahotsav, brings to the fore the delicate balance between religious festivities and civic responsibilities. The Rajasthan High Court’s remarks serve as a reminder of the need to uphold the ideals and virtues of revered figures like Lord Ram, not just in spirit but also in actions that reflect respect for law and public order.
[Read Order]
FOLLOW US ON YOUTUBE FOR MORE LEGAL UPDATES
