Explore the inspiring journeys of 11 woman judges of the Supreme Court of India, from Justice Fathima Beevi to B.V. Nagarathna, shaping the future of empowering justice.
A case against YouTubers for alleged obscenity in India’s Got Latent has sparked debate on digital content regulation. With the Samay Raina and Ranveer Allahbadia controversy gaining traction, public opinion is divided on obscenity. This raises questions about Indian obscenity laws and Broadcasting Network Standards (BNS) governing television and digital media.
Justice Hrishikesh Roy retired from the Supreme Court of India on 31st January 2024 after serving for more than five years. During his time in the Supreme Court, he wrote 45 judgments and was part of 324 benches. He was among the four judges appointed to the Supreme Court in 2019 along with Justices Krishna Murari, S.R. Bhat, and V. Ramasubramanian.
Justice K Vinod Chandran, an esteemed jurist from Kerala, has had a distinguished career spanning advocacy, taxation law, and judicial service. With over 11 years on the bench at the Kerala High Court and a tenure as Chief Justice of the Patna High Court, his judicial expertise has shaped key legal precedents. Elevated to the Supreme Court of India on January 16, 2025, Justice Chandran brings a wealth of experience in constitutional and administrative law. His notable rulings, including upholding the Bihar caste survey and striking down excessive reservations, reflect his commitment to judicial integrity and constitutional principles. Here’s a look at his career, elevation, and landmark judgments.
As the Supreme Court of India celebrates its 75th anniversary on January 28, 2025, addressing the growing case backlog calls for structural reforms beyond increasing bench strength. In 2024, Indian courts achieved a milestone by disposing of more cases than were pending, with district courts resolving over 13.4 million cases. High courts and the Supreme Court also made strides, aided by technological advancements like e-filing, virtual hearings, and ADR methods. Initiatives like the eCourts scheme have further streamlined judicial processes, fostering efficiency and accessibility in the legal system.
Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has revolutionized the Indian judicial system by enabling ordinary citizens to approach courts for the greater good of society. PIL serves as a powerful tool to uphold justice, protect fundamental rights, and address issues that impact large sections of the population. Whether it’s environmental protection, human rights violations, or accountability in governance, PIL ensures that justice reaches even the most marginalized communities.
Justice DY Chandrachud, the former Chief Justice of India, is known for his powerful and progressive judgements that have made a significant impact on India’s legal system. His dissents are also one of the most highlighted moments of his tenure. These are not just disagreements; they reflect his strong beliefs in individual rights, equality, and justice. Often challenging traditional views and questioning majority decisions, his opinions stand out for their clarity and deep understanding of the law. These dissents have sparked important discussions and have the potential to change how laws are interpreted in India.