The Supreme Court of India, while hearing the Delhi government’s plea regarding the ‘Farishtey Dilli Ke‘ scheme, has sought a response from Lieutenant Governor VK Saxena. The Supreme Court of India, while hearing the Delhi government’s plea regarding the ‘Farishtey Dilli Ke‘ scheme, has sought a response from Lieutenant Governor VK Saxena. The scheme, aimed […]
Nariman’s reflections on the absence of dissent in the Article 370 verdict resonate with his earlier concerns. In a conversation with journalist Karan Thapar from The Wire, he described the verdict as ‘totally erroneous and bad in law’. Senior Advocate Fali S Nariman, a distinguished figure in the Indian legal fraternity, has yesterday 5th Jan […]
Justice B V Nagarathna, the future first woman Chief Justice of India, emphasized the judiciary’s role in advancing gender equality and women’s representation. She highlighted the need for affirmative action, equal property rights, and inclusivity in the legal profession. Her address underscored the critical role of the judiciary in shaping a more equitable society.
The lawyer, realizing his mistake, promptly apologized. However, CJI Chandrachud reiterated his point, emphasizing the need for proper courtroom etiquette.
The Supreme Court of India, led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, along with Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, has today morning, 3rd January 2024 delivered a significant verdict in the case
The controversy traces back to January 24, when Hindenburg Research, a US-based short-selling firm, released a damning report accusing the Adani Group of engaging in manipulative practices to inflate its stock prices.
The PIL, which seeks the implementation of the ‘Kavach’ scheme, also calls for the establishment of an expert commission. In a significant move towards enhancing railway safety in India, the Supreme Court has called for the Central Government’s response regarding the implementation of the ‘Kavach’ scheme, aimed at preventing train accidents. The hearing, led by […]
The hearing also touched upon the nature of the survey, with Solicitor General Tushar Mehta clarifying that it did not constitute a census as understood under the Indian Constitution
Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi mentioned the petition before Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud for urgent listing. Rohatgi highlighted the extraordinary nature of the High Court’s order, which was passed without hearing the officer.
The Calcutta High Court’s upcoming hearing on the plea against Sujay Bhadra is a critical development in the cash-for-jobs scam case
