The Madhya Pradesh High Court took suo motu cognisance of threats against Judge Tabassum Khan, holding that judicial officers cannot be intimidated for passing orders and directing protection, affidavits from top officials, and strict action against those responsible.
The Jharkhand High Court held that a husband’s unwillingness to live with his wife or emotional distance alone does not amount to cruelty under Section 498A IPC. The Court said normal matrimonial discord, lack of communication, or reluctance to perform conjugal obligations cannot by themselves constitute the offence.
The Gauhati High Court held that producing 16 documents alone cannot establish Indian citizenship if they fail to satisfy the legal burden under the Foreigners Act. The Court ruled that the person claiming citizenship must prove they are not a foreigner.
The Chhattisgarh High Court observed that no child can be compelled to recite Hindu prayers in government schools while hearing a plea challenging the State government’s June 12 circular. The Court stressed that participation in religious prayers cannot be forced on students.
The Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association (SCAORA) condemned threats and a coordinated social media campaign against MP Judge Tabassum Khan, saying judicial orders must be challenged in appellate courts, not through intimidation, as such conduct undermines judicial independence and the rule of law.
The Delhi High Court said Aaj Tak, “probably in the zeal of securing higher TRPs,” violated the privacy and confidentiality rights of a child sexual abuse survivor, while upholding a Rs.5 lakh compensation order against the broadcaster.
The Delhi High Court referred the defamation dispute between Anjana Om Kashyap and Khan Sir to mediation after the journalist and TV Today filed a Rs.2 crore suit over remarks calling her “bikau patrakar” and “chatukar.”
The Delhi High Court warned that spouses cannot use intimate photographs to shame each other, stressing that privacy and dignity must remain protected and matrimonial disputes should never become contests of mutual humiliation through private material.
The Supreme Court ruled that Gujarat municipal poll candidates must disclose both their own and their spouse’s assets in election affidavits to ensure transparency. It also held that a magistrate’s incorrect statutory provision at cognisance does not automatically invalidate criminal proceedings.
The Supreme Court held that an accused cannot claim default bail merely because a copy of the chargesheet was not supplied. It also ruled that failure to file additional chargesheet copies under Section 193(8) of the BNSS does not invalidate the chargesheet.
