The Supreme Court has clarified that applications seeking extension of time under Section 29A of the Arbitration Act must be filed before the civil court of original jurisdiction, even where the arbitrator was appointed by the High Court under Section 11.
The Supreme Court of India has issued a circular announcing a two-minute silence at 11 AM on January 30, 2026, as part of Martyrs’ Day observances to honour freedom fighters who sacrificed their lives for the nation.
Madras High Court criticized the High Court Registry for denying maternity leave for a third pregnancy, calling the stance a “pedantic approach.” The Bench directed the immediate grant of leave and emphasized that the precedent applies to all similarly situated employees.
The Supreme Court declined to halt tree felling for Ahmedabad’s riverfront project, observing that development must balance environmental concerns. The Court upheld the NGT’s findings and noted planned compensatory afforestation measures.
The Patna High Court upheld the death sentence in a brutal triple murder case, invoking the Mahabharat to stress that violence rooted in Adharm leads aggressors to an inevitable and tragic end.
The UGC’s Promotion of Equity in Higher Education Institutions Regulations, 2026, have been challenged before the Supreme Court for allegedly excluding general category students from the grievance redressal mechanism, raising constitutional concerns over equality and access to justice in universities.
The Supreme Court has rebuked the Bar Council of India (BCI) for refusing travel allowances and honorarium to retired judges supervising Bar Council elections, questioning how they are expected to cover expenses personally and warning against non-compliance with court directives.
The Patna High Court held that a public officer performing quasi-judicial duties in mutation proceedings qualifies as a “Judge” under the Judges (Protection) Act, 1985. Consequently, criminal prosecution for such official orders is barred unless statutory exceptions apply.
The Supreme Court observed that Article 32 cannot be invoked to resolve every administrative grievance while hearing a plea against West Bengal’s Special Intensive Revision, where voters raised concerns over surname mismatches and documentation issues during verification.
The Bar Council of India (BCI) has approached the Chief Justice of India (CJI), objecting to the Kerala High Court’s remarks on State Bar Council elections, arguing that once the Supreme Court approves the election framework, High Courts lack jurisdiction to intervene.
